Tiburon GT vs WRX RSX GT-S SVT MR2

[WRXreX]

Here is a comparison among eight cars chosen as 8 great ride in Sport Compact Car magazine.
Interesting:
1. 30-50 mph: RSX Type-S and SpecV have same time @ 2.5 sec
2. 1/4 trap speed for RSX Type-S and WRX are almost identical
3. Tiburon and GT-S beat RSX Type-S and Spec V to 30MPH
4. Tiburon GT beat GT-S and SVT to 60mph and 1/4
5. MR2 is deceptively fast!

(In the order of Fastest -> Slowest 1/4 time)
WRX
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 2.0 sec.
0-60 mph: 5.7 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.3 sec.
50-70 mph: 3.4 sec.
Quarter Mile: 14.1 sec. @ 94.6 mph

Acura RSX Type-S
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 3.0 sec.
0-60 mph: 6.9 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.5 sec.
50-70 mph: 3.4 sec.
Quarter Mile: 15.0 sec. @ 94.5 mph

MR2 Spyder
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 2.3 sec
0-60 mph: 7 sec
30-50 mph: 2.8 sec
50-70 mph: 4 sec
Quarter Mile time: 15.1 sec
Quarter Mile speed: 89.1 mph

Sentra Spec V
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 3.1 sec.
0-60 mph: 7.4 sec
30-50 mph: 2.5 sec.
50-70 mph: 3.8 sec.
Quarter Mile time: 15.4 sec.
Quarter Mile speed: 90.8 mph

Tiburon GT
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 2.9 sec.
0-60 mph: 7.6 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.8 sec.
50-70 mph: 4.1 sec
Quarter Mile: 15.6 sec. @ 88.8 mph

2002 FORD SVT FOCUS
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 3.3 sec.
0-60 mph: 7.9 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.9 sec.
50-70 mph: 4.1 sec.
Quarter Mile time: 15.8 sec.
Quarter Mile speed: 89.5 sec

Celica GT-S
Acceleration
0-30 mph: 2.9 sec
0-60 mph: 8.1 sec
30-50 mph: 3 sec
50-70 mph: 4.4 sec
Quarter Mile time: 15.8 sec
Quarter Mile speed: 88.6 mph
<img src=/images/forums/snitz/thumbup.gif width=25 height=18 border=0>


<hr noshade width=60% size=1 align=left>02 WRC Blue WRX
3" BPM-GT Turboback
AEM CAI - silver
Prodrive OZ P1 rims 215/45/17 PE950
photos.yahoo.com/malelee21


Edited by - WRXreX on 02/26/2002 5:02:00 PM

Edited by - WRXreX on 02/26/2002 5:12:16 PM

[goremaster]

Shit i thought the Tibby wuz gonna be last...i'm so happy ! In canada the RSX S-type is 10,000 more and it only beats it by .7 seconds...nice.<img src=/images/forums/snitz/smile.gif width=15 height=15 border=0>


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>jui

[Shadowgate]

I guess we finally settle the huge argument about the 2003 tib being slow <img src=/images/forums/snitz/smile.gif width=15 height=15 border=0>

Now all you people who said it was slow can shutup! <img src=/images/forums/snitz/approve.gif width=15 height=15 border=0>


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>

[WRXreX]

"We took it to our favorite mountain road with another Eight Great contestant for a head-to-head battle. The winner would make the list.

And the Hyundai, after only a few minutes of flogging, was the clear victor.

With massive grip, thanks to its sticky 215/45ZR-17 Michelin Pilot Sport tires and very little body roll, the Hyundai's composure was as impressive as it was unexpected. The harder we drove the Tiburon, the more Hyundai's performance goals became obvious. It's good at going quickly. Blast into a corner with way too much speed? Nothing a little trim with the brakes mid-corner won't cure. The Tiburon's response to trail braking and/or left foot braking stands out as one of its finer handling points. Handling is also characterized by heavy damping, which results in very well-controlled body movement and excellent stability over uneven roads and at high speed."

About GT-S being slow is due to glitch in ECU not allowing rpm to go beyond 6800rpm.


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>02 WRC Blue WRX
3" BPM-GT Turboback
AEM CAI - silver
Prodrive OZ P1 rims 215/45/17 PE950
photos.yahoo.com/malelee21

[matthew]

If you read the article The celica is actually quite faster but it had computer problems, be fair in your story. The celica does not do a 0- 60 time of 8.2. Race one you'll find out. I have driven one and there quick.


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>

[Lord Coca]

Yeah, the Celica gt-s is much faster than what it says up there.


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>

[Flux]

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Shit i thought the Tibby wuz gonna be last...i'm so happy ! In canada the RSX S-type is 10,000 more and it only beats it by .7 seconds...nice
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

Where do you get $10,000 from? The base Tib?
The US GT they have there is pretty close to the Canadian GS-R, with an MSRP of $28,795, while the MSRP on the Type-S is $31,000, not $39,000. <img src=/images/forums/snitz/uhh.gif width=15 height=15 border=0>


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left><a href="http://24.76.149.2/">Silver 2k SE</a>

[Rudy H]

Will intake/headers and exhaust really shave at LEAST 0.6 seconds off the 1/4 mile <img src=/images/forums/snitz/uhh.gif width=15 height=15 border=0><img src=/images/forums/snitz/uhh.gif width=15 height=15 border=0> I don't think so.

Talk about making it a difficult decision now<img src=/images/forums/snitz/cry.gif width=16 height=16 border=0><img src=/images/forums/snitz/cry.gif width=16 height=16 border=0> cause I well I think these numbers are gonna be pretty darn accurate cause its done by the same people etc. Except well the GT-S


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>2003 Hyundai Tiburon GS-R V6 --on order still--

1999 Hyundai Sonata GL V6
H7 Blue Eurolite
GLS Chrome Grill
Custom Intake/Header/Exhaust
55 shot Nitrous Express

--no longer with me--
1997 Hyundai Tiburon
Was a brave soul when combating the evi

[4doorGL]

From the dyno sheet they posted I believe there was a problem with their Tib they tested too. The torque dropped off waaaaaay too much after about 4500RPM.


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>"Hey, if my prize is your foot up my arse... its still a prize.... " - <b>WhoopOi</b>

<a href="http://shop.hyundaiperformance.com">Shop.HyundaiPerforman ce.Com</a>, your one-stop shop for Hyundai performance parts (coming soon)

[Mateus]

The torque dropping off is probably because it reached its max torque at 4500 rpm, like most cars.


<hr width=60% noshade size=1 align=left>"Even in death we live!"